| Message |
z: overall build (nice), performance (strong), reliable (stock will run for a loooong time), mods avail (many), reaction to mods (biggest jump would be ecu and jets, then bigger turbo's), price (varies..you pay for what you get..nuff said) supra: overall build (nice), performance (strong), reliable (stock will run for a long time), mods avail (many), reaction to mods (much better than Z's for less money), price (higher due to a newer car and lower miles) 3000gt vr4: overall build (nice), performance (strong), reliable (stock..just slightly under the above), mods avail (many), reaction to mods (unknown to this monkey), price (varies) the variable specs that can sway the masses z: long time history and z'ers are loyal and not crackheads. turbo's are hard to upgrade and when you go big the price will be paid...as in money. supra: some might say supra owners are cock-n-ball dill holes. some are not, some are. the ones who are make the rest of the supra owners look like homo's. bigger stock turbo's and injectors. this means you can get more power from 'stock' trim. turbo(s) are easier to upgrade due to the location in the engine bay. 3000gt vr4: it just plain looks like ass. way to many gimics. they do have awd but 90% of the time its front wheel drive. again, they look like butthole warmed on a open fire.
do some research, and you will know better. dont jump into something if you dont have to.
|
 |
